November 21, 2000

Hydro One Networks

RP-2000-0068

EXHIBIT LIST

1	Application

1.1	Application dated July 5, 2000, has been filed by Hydro One Networks Inc. ("HO Networks") with the Ontario Energy Board (the "Board") pursuant to section 92 of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B). HO Networks has applied for an Order of the Board for leave to construct two 230 kilovolt ("kV") double circuit transmission lines, approximately 20 kilometres long, from its Hawthorne Transformer Station ("TS") in the City of Ottawa, to Gamble Junction in the City of Cumberland, and then to the Ontario-Québec provincial border at the Ottawa River.

1.2	Prefiled evidence was filed on August 10, 2000

2	Notices

2.1	Notice of Application, dated September 15, 2000

2.2	Notice of hearing, dated November 7, 2000

2.3	Revised Notice of Hearing, dated November 20, 2000

3	Procedural Orders

3.1	Procedural Order No. 1, dated September 26, 2000

4	Letters of Direction

4.1	Letter of Direction - Notices A and B, dated August 11, 2000

4.2	Revised Letter of Direction-Notices A and B, dated August 22, 2000

4.3	Letter of Direction - Procedural Order No. 1, sep 26, 2000

5	Affidavits

5.1	Affidavit of Service and Publication of Notice of Application, dated Sep 26, 2000, signed by Glen MacDonald

5.2	Supplementary Affidavit of Service and Publication of Notice of Application, dated Nov 3, 2000, signed by Glen MacDonald

6.	Observers

6.1	David and Judith Farmer

6.2	Canadian Niagara Power

6.3	ECNG Inc.

6.4	Enwin Utilities Inc.

6.5	Ministry of Citizenship Culture and Recreation

6.6	Weir and Foulds

6.7	Trinity o/b of Riotrin Properties (Cumberland Inc.)

6.8	Elisabeth and Jack Rigley (late observers)

6.9	Double R. Consulting Corporation

7.	Intervenors

7.1	Ontario Power Generation Inc.

7.2	Barrett and Elizabeth Adams

7.3	Cisela Thoren &Gordon Majcher

7.4	Dr. John J. Mosco

7.5	The Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton

7.6	L.J. Perrault Estate represented by Francois Perrault

7.7	Toronto Hydro Electric System

7.8	Northwatch J. Lloyd Greenspoon, Lawyer

7.9	Dofasco Inc.

7.8	Pollution Probe

7.9	Hebert McKinley Ramonat LLP, Representing Carmella Loeper

7.10	Norman A. Baines Minister, Orleans United Church

7.11	TransEnergie a Division of Hydro Quebec

7.12	Electrical Safety Authority

7.13	City of Cumberland, Vice & Hunter, Peter Vice

7.14	Union Gas Limited

7.15	Ron & Deborah McPhail

7.16	Independent Electricity Market Operator IMO

7.17	Vulnerable Energy Consumers Coalition (VECC)	(late intervention)

8	Interrogatories on pre-filed evidence

8.1	Board Staff Interrogatories, received October 6, 2000

8.2	OPG Interrogatories, received October 6, 2000

8.3	Vulnerable Energy Consumers Coalition (VECC), received October 10, 2000

8.4	Electrical Safety Authority, dated October 4, 2000

8.5	Region of Ottawa-Carlton, dated October 5, 2000

8.6	Pollution Probe, dated October 5, 2000

9.	HydroOne's Responses to Interrogatories

9.1	Responses to Board Staff Interrogatories, OPG Interrogatories, Vulnerable Energy Consumers Coalition (VECC), Electrical Safety Authority, Region of Ottawa-Carlton, and Pollution Probe

10.	Intervenor's Evidence

10.1	Evidence of the City of Cumberland, dated October 25, 2000

10.2	Evidence of the Region of Ottawa-Carlton, dated October 24, 2000

11.	Interrogatories on Intervenor's Evidence

11.1	Board Staff Interrogatories on the evidence of the Region of Ottawa-Carlton,

November 1, 2000

11.2	Board Staff Interrogatories on the evidence of the City of Cumberland,

November 1, 2000

12.	Motions

12.1	Notice of Motion on Behalf of Pollution Probe, received November 21, 2000

13.	General Correspondence

13.1	Letter of Comment by Frank Lucano dated Sep 15, 2000

13.2	Letter by Region of Ottawa-Carlton re: compensation vs cost, dated Sep 19, 2000

13.3	Letter from Power Budd representing TransEnergie, dated Sep 19, 2000

13.4	Letter from HydroOne re: timing of approvals, dated Sep 25, 2000

13.5	Letter from Mr. Ron McPhail, concerns/questions, dated Oct 3, 2000

13.6	Letter from Dofasco, re: not seeking an award of costs, dated Oct 6, 2000

13.7	Letter from D. Fernandes representing M. C. Menard, re: compensation for damages, dated Oct 19, 2000

13.8	Letter from M Klippenstein on behalf of Pollution Probe, advise that will request a motion for further interrogatory answers by Hydro One, dated Oct 26, 2000

13.9	Letter of Direction to the StenoTran, dated November 8, 2000

13.10	Response by the Board to IMO letters dated Sep 13 and sep 27, 2000, dated Nov 7, 2000

13.11	Request by Pollution Probe for a motion date to dismiss the Application, dated Nov 9, 2000

13.12	From Hydro Quebec, change of address, dated Nov 9, 2000

13.13	Letter to the Board from MEST- Legal Branch, dated Nov 10, 2000

13.14	Letter by the Board to all parties re: possible approached to deal with issues raised by the City of Cumberland and Pollution Probe, dated Nov 10, 2000

13.15	Letter from Peter Thomson representing the City of Cumberland, dated Nov 14, 2000

13.16	TransEnergie submission-preferred procedure to deal with the issue raised by the City of Cumberland and Pollution Probe, dated November 15, 2000

13.17	Pollution Probe submission-preferred procedure to deal with the issue raised by the City of Cumberland and Pollution Probe, dated November 15, 2000

13.18	Ministry of the Attorney General submission- procedure to deal with the issue raised by the City of Cumberland and Pollution Probe, dated November 15, 2000

13.19	HydroOne submission- procedure to deal with the issue raised by the City of Cumberland and Pollution Probe, dated November 15, 2000

13.20	e-mail from an intervenor, Mr. Ron McPhail, request that his concerns are addressed in his absence in the hearing, dated Nov 15, 2000

13.21	Copy of a letter from Hydro One to Peter Vice representing the City of Cumberland, dated Nov 16, 2000

13.22	Witness responsibility summary by Hydro One, received Nov 20, 2000