Implementation of the OEB Decision to eliminate the Hydro One Seasonal Rate Class

Hydro One Networks Inc.
EB-2020-0246, EB-2019-0234, EB-2016-0315

On September 17, 2020, the OEB issued its Decision and Order on Hydro One’s motion to review and vary the March 12, 2015 Decision that directed the elimination of Hydro One’s seasonal rate class. The OEB found that Hydro One’s Motion failed on its merits and confirmed the 2015 Decision to eliminate the seasonal class.

Having confirmed that Hydro One’s seasonal rate class will be eliminated, Hydro One was directed to file an updated report that includes proposed mitigation measures to smooth the bill impacts for seasonal customers. Hydro One’s report was filed October 15, 2020.

To find out more:
 - read Hydro One's October 15, 2020 Report
 - jump to Status of the Proceeding



Hydro One Networks Inc. (Hydro One) has a customer distribution rate class known as the seasonal class. These are residential customers that receive electrical service at dwellings that they do not occupy long enough during the year to meet the requirements for the year-round residential customer distribution rate class.* The dwellings in question can include cottages, chalets and camps.

* Among other things, a customer will be in the seasonal class if they do not live in the dwelling in question for at least 4 days of the week for 8 months of the year. Further details about the seasonal class are available from Hydro One’s website.


Determining costs to serve customers
Hydro One, like all utilities, incurs costs to install and maintain the assets that are needed to provide service to all their customers. Once the revenue required to cover those costs is determined, the next step is to divide or allocate the costs among all of their different classes of customers based on what it costs to serve each class (this is referred to as "cost causality").

A key factor in determining cost causality is density. It costs less for Hydro One to provide service to their customers who live in more populated areas than it does for those who live in rural or remote areas that require more infrastructure per customer, like poles, wires and transformers, to serve them. For example, if there are 10 customers attached to a series of lines, poles and related transformers, rather than three customers, the costs are shared by more customers and therefore each customer pays less.

In its March 12, 2015 Decision on Hydro One’s distribution rates application, the OEB decided to eliminate the seasonal class and to move seasonal customers into one of Hydro One’s other residential customer classes based on density. The OEB’s concern was that the distribution rates charged to seasonal customers are not reflective of the cost to serve them.

The OEB was aware that eliminating the seasonal class would cause bill impacts for Hydro One’s seasonal customers, and particularly would cause bills to increase for lower-use seasonal customers. The OEB directed Hydro One to bring forward a bill mitigation** plan to address bill impacts for customers whose bills would increase by more than 10% as a result of moving to another rate class. Hydro One filed its report in August 2015.

**Bill mitigation is a tool used by the OEB to protect consumers from having large bill increases at one time - for example by phasing in the increase over a number of years.


This follow-up proceeding started in late 2016 in order to consider the remaining steps for the elimination of the seasonal class. At that time, the OEB directed Hydro One to file an update to its August 2015 report, which it did December 1, 2016.

The proceeding was paused in September 2018, pending the outcome of another major Hydro One distribution rates case before the OEB. Hydro One was notified that it would need to file an updated report after the rates case decision was issued. The updated report was filed July 19, 2019.

According to Hydro One’s updated report, a little more than half of seasonal customers would see their bills go up, and a little less than half would see them go down, as a result of the elimination of the seasonal rate class. The report also included a proposed alternative that would maintain the seasonal rate class.


How does the OEB consider motions to review?
The OEB has Rules of Practice and Procedure that utilities are expected to follow. In this way, all interested parties are aware of how the OEB typically deals with different procedural matters. The OEB’s Rules of Practice and Procedure reflect the OEB's goal of ensuring the most just, expeditious and efficient decisions on the merits of every proceeding before the OEB.

  • Under the OEB’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, a review of an earlier decision can take place in two stages. In the first stage, the OEB considers whether there is a question as to the correctness of the earlier decision. This is referred to as the "threshold question". If the answer to the "threshold question" is that there is such a question, the second stage will look at whether the earlier decision should be changed. This is referred to as a "review on the merits".

Status of the Proceeding

In Procedural Order No. 3, issued September 17, 2019, the OEB determined that it would consider Hydro One’s proposal to maintain the seasonal rate class as a request to reconsider the 2015 OEB decision. Procedurally, as set out in the OEB’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, requests to reconsider earlier OEB decisions are made as a Motion to Review.

Although Hydro One did not follow the proper procedure to seek a review of the OEB’s 2015 Decision to eliminate the seasonal class, the OEB decided that it would allow Hydro One the opportunity to make its case that the Decision should be reconsidered.

On October 1, Hydro One filed additional materials in support of the motion as well as its submission on the threshold question of whether the March 2015 Decision to eliminate the seasonal rate class should be reviewed.

A separate panel established to determine the threshold question reviewed that aspect of Hydro One’s submission. On March 12, 2020, under file number EB-2019-0234, the OEB issued a Decision and Order that found that Hydro One had cited grounds that have led the OEB to determine that the 2015 Decision to eliminate the Hydro One seasonal rate class should be reviewed.

In Procedural Order No. 2, issued May 1, 2020, the OEB determined that the seasonal rates elimination proceeding would be combined with the motion threshold proceeding, (EB-2019-0234/EB-2016-0315), and would only deal with the merits of the motion. The OEB asked for any additional submissions parties might have on the merits be limited to:

  1. The Board’s "Subsequent Decision to Move to All Fixed Residential Rates."
  2. The ground cited by Hydro One in its submission under the change in circumstances category as "The Subsequent Introduction of Distribution Rate Protection."

The most recent proceeding was to examine whether these two changes should cause the OEB to take a different approach to the elimination of the seasonal rate class. 

On September 17, 2020, the OEB issued its decision. It found that neither of these two changes in circumstances cause the OEB to conclude that the 2015 decision was incorrect. The OEB has confirmed that the 2015 decision to eliminate the seasonal rate class should stand, and that seasonal customers should be placed into the same classes as other Hydro One customers with similar use of distribution assets. 

Having confirmed that Hydro One’s seasonal rate class will be eliminated, Hydro One was directed to file an updated report that includes proposed mitigation measures to smooth the bill impacts for seasonal customers. Hydro One filed its updated report October 15, 2020.

Next steps in the proceeding will follow in due course.


More Information


Submit a letter of comment

You can submit a letter of comment that will be considered by the Board deciding the application. Unless the notice states otherwise, your letter of comment must be received by the Board no later than 60 days after the publication or service date of the notice for the application.

Your letter will be provided directly to the panel of Board members who will be deciding whether the application is approved. The panel will consider your comments in reaching their decision. In reaching its decision, the panel will only be able to consider comments which relate to issues which are within the authority of the Board and relevant to the issues being considered by the panel.

More about commenting and privacy

More about commenting and privacy
All letters of comment sent to the Board are placed on the public record. This means the letters can be seen at our offices and will be placed on our website. Before the letter of comment is placed on the public record, all personal (i.e. not business) contact information is removed, such as the individual's address, fax and phone numbers, and email address. The individual's name and the content of the letter will become part of the public record.

If you would like a response from the applicant, please send a copy of your letter directly to the applicant, including your contact information. The Board removes your contact information from your letter for privacy reasons before it is posted to our website.Show less

This information will be visible on the OEB's public website.
Upload an attachment only if you need to submit additional information relating to your comment. Only PDF and Word files will be accepted.
Choose file
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Get updates about this application:

Or mail the below address with the reference number EB-2020-0246, EB-2019-0234, EB-2016-0315

Ontario Energy Board
P.O. Box 2319
2300 Yonge Street, 27th Floor
Toronto ON M4P 1E4
Attn: Board Secretary